Okay, firstly, this guy is an awesome philosopher. I love the originality of his character and the unique voice you write him with. His thought process is a mixture of funny and intriguing. I'm sorry, I'm totally a sucker for flawed characters, especially when their flaws are realistic and interesting.
I like the ambiguous ending- unless, wait, was it supposed to be clear what happened? Because if he was shot I doubt he would describe it as a "pull" and he did drop the knife after all.
I don't know of the contest, but I am curious as to what the actual prompt was. I don't know if you need to include it though. *shrug*
I didn't see any tense or spelling/grammar troubles, but I don't really have an eye for that. By the way, was the exclusion of quotation marks on purpose or not?
Awesome piece, thank you for sharing.
Gender:
Points: 2556
Reviews: 45