Eh... the second part is interesting, but seeing as it is in third person and it centers on another character, it doesn't fit. Usually, if you begin to use another viewpoint of a character, you would start a new chapter, clarifying who you're centering on. For instance, you mentioned Jessica's name straight away. That's good -- but if you're planning on moving from character to character, you would have to make it a lot more apparent when Hunter is narrator.
And you have to choose which one you want to use - third person or first person. Switching from back and forth is generally not a good idea. I've seen some stories where it worked, but those stories were never published, and those writers were just... we're talking about extremely publishable writers who I can look at a story and not find any flaw in it whatsoever, they're that good. Really talented writers... but they never even tried to publish those works.
First person is if you want to talk directly to the writer. It seems a lot more conversational and it can connect the reader to the character really fast. The downfalls are the lack of description (I think that's why you chose third person for the second part). Third person is if you wnat to detach the readers from the characters and make it more of a story and less of reality. If that makes any sense.
Either way, I would suggest getting rid of that part altogether. That is something that I would call a leftover. A leftover, basically, is something that is interesting that the writer must keep in mind while writing the story, but isn't necessary for the reader to know. And, since it seems like you're writing in Hunter's viewpoint more, I would suggest making it completely in his viewpoint. By doing this, you would have to make sure that this "Jessica" bit is described to some extent. Maybe Hunter meets her? I don't know.
Right now, it seems that you did this so that you can get away with not describing Hunter's and Jessica's reactions with each other. Don't do that...
Gender:
Points: 3891
Reviews: 3821